I think Apocryphal is a realistic evil candidate.
Principally given, not only was her initial greeting a way of seeming involved without promoting proclivity, but she also grew readily defensive about being “suspected” at (#437) when nobody had said anything of the kind, she didn’t have any votes and I’d only made one relevant aside comment.
The only way this comment really makes sense in my mind is if Apo misread the tangent between Bystander and I, since neither of us were accusing each other nor were there any implications to draw regarding our alignments from the conversation.
Apo’s one relevant read was to assert my demeanour seemed impure at (#442), but rather than committing or explaining such a read even when prompted to, twice, she double-downed on discrediting the only scumread she’s made thus far.
Source
With that said, Apo has been self-aware regarding her own absence from the game, which could tangibly point away from this particular assessment being correct.
But voting Phrase first and foremost for this reasoning vaguely feels as though Apo felt like she was lagging behind, and not only sought to call it out but also fabricated a reasoning to push another opening vote that looks like it came from the RVS (Random voting stage) phase.
Apo has prepared a few odd townleans, but none of them felt extremely noteworthy to me. Jarek/Frost/Bystander in particular, although the lack of commentary on other interactive slots such as Daeron does intrigue me.
There’s also a vague suspicion that another post Apo made could have been a wording slip, but that wouldn’t be convincing to anyone aside from myself so I’m neglecting to share it.
This assessment is predictably false.
