Kittens Game: Combinatorics Mafia - GAME OVER, TOWN WIN

Yet getting a 0/3 or a 2/3 or a 3/3 is objectively better than any of the aforemenetioned.

And we are never getting anything but a 1/3 on D1

Why is that?

Because evils will never let that happen

If we pick 3 good people, do you really think they will just throw in the towel and just be like fuck it

It wont happen, they will force themselves into the 3 to taint the results

This is why we need to have 2, because if we pick 2 people, evils have 0 good options. 0/2 confirms 2 good people which sucks for them, 1/2 is super restrictive and locks down a ton of options for evils

And 2/2 is a death sentence

I will say that I hate that people have made me paranoid that weā€™re on a course of a 1/3 when before I did believe itā€™d be a 0/3 and so I canā€™t argue back as hard.

But if you can please contribute reads and other things rather than the 2 vs 3 argument Iā€™d truly appreciate that.

I cant make reads for shit, why do you think I want to lock people as good

I got no clue

Reads arenā€™t to lock people in as anything.
Itā€™s to provide space for where your mind is at.
Is anybody particularly pinging as suspicious to you?
Had anything somebody said made you think theyā€™re towny?

If I know that X or Y is good, then I can start to make judgements off it

But I got fucking nothing to work with, and stats dont work either when evils know each other

The specific things is that 1) everyone seems to want to put the same 3 people in, which should be a very strong indicator the result will be a 1/3, and 2) everyone wants to put 3 people in, which should be a very strong indicator evils want to put 3 people in over 2

There was no resistance, which is much more telling. Its not what happens that is informative, its what doesnt happen that gives information

Okay my class is over
Earlier I said I think that Frost is scum and that heā€™s voting exactly one of his partners cuz as weā€™ve established 1/3 is like really bad
And so when you suggested we vote only one person so serious Iā€™m like ā€œthatā€™s not a good move at all this person is scumā€
So I was gonna vote you and Frost and then one of the people Frost was voting but I then found out YOU were one of the people Frost was voting

Im saying 1 is better then 3, but 2 is best.

idk how people think this guy is scum rn

I still really donā€™t agree
Yes itā€™s a bigger risk but it also gives us way more info and we need to solve before the scum who have the advantage of immediately knowing 3 people donā€™t need to be checked (themselves) so we need to use as few guesses as possible which means guessing more people