I know thats what they actually said, but based on how they went on to explain it, feels more like what I said above to me
I agree we shouldnāt crown anyone who pushes for the King Today, but that doesnāt mean we canāt crown anyone if we have an election Tomorrow.
Youāre just stuck in your own world. I get that I am a pessimist, but that doesnāt mean I can dictate what will and will not happen if this or that happens.
To you, but I have different experience when somebody says: This is valuable town weāve lost today. I did some real life social deduction mafia games you know
The king straight up isnāt dying if the only thing we have on them is āwell they could be evilā
So Iād say not townclear Merpy for being derpy because she sees Daeron as an asset too valuable to lose.
sorry was tired :( had a long night last time woke up early and decided I wanted to sleep in again
will read fully now
*looks at Frost not voting anyone until heās formed enough opinions on everyone*
*looks at Merpy trying to learn this gameās format*
*looks at Saynoās non-existence*
*looks at the people currently talking*
*looks at the five votes not sitting on Daeron as of now*
Bud. Are we even playing the same game?
I never said that we would just execute the King. (Heck, all I am saying is that the Kingās execution is not the worst possible option.) Kiiruma condemned rolefishers in his opening post, but itās not as if we canāt formulate general plans for each one of the six role types.
Also, you fear Unseen would potentially kill a teammate, but you doubt we would hiy the pot of gold? Talk about double standards.
Again: I also donāt advocate for the Kingās death. Iām just saying it wouldnāt be āobjectively the worst optionā.
By the way, the vote for the New King (in the event Daeron ever dies) is done in private, so unless we unanimously decide on a New King, the evils are most likely going to get the upper hand. (ā¦well. Maybe, maybe not. If some slanker such as Sayno becomes the New King, then itād obviously be suspicious.)
to answer the questions you sent - zone and hazard seem solidly town, their itneractions with canping seem town both ends
regarding the king if itās not probability based like hazard pointed out iād say ehhh not really to voting out the king unless there is absolutely zero other choice
that being said I would still like to hear from the (mia) beancat on the king vote so early 2nd voter always makes me wary, also the push on me that vanished is unusual but i mean ig ppl donāt know my playstyle at the same time ehhh idk if itās too early to say anything on beancat but either way would like to hear more
i am also still holding a grudge against jail for those gifs but i donāt have anything concrete to support that
i come from a mech heavy mafia community that āno oneā votes on day 1 spare me im bad at social reads
If Achro was a wolf heād want to be more mechanical and methodical but the amount of mistakes heās made makes me think heās just town. Heās a good scum player and yet seems too unaware for groupwolf.
Might be neut, sure. But even then I feel like heād enquire about things better.
I mean we can and should be coordinating King things to reduce the control of information evil has over us
I donāt think we would benefit from doing it now though, since itād be just a waste of time. We should do it when / if the election ever happens.
gotta backread sorry
I havenāt played a game this complex before. Closest experience I have is TOS. Given the flavor text surrounding the King role and the King abilities themselves, I viewed it kinda like a VIP or less powerful mayor role. I still am of this mindset as I havenāt seen evidence that the king isnāt useful, but I just want to make that apparent. I donāt know what the normal expectation for king is in this game. Iām gauging its value by comparing it to the closest comparison I can think of.
I understand that it is not like TOS mayor where itās a guaranteed good, but I still donāt think itās a role we should just toss out the window without giving it much thought.
You seem confident in this sentiment. Why is this? (Itās not that I disagree. You just give me the impression that you are familiar with the set-up).
I donāt think I understand what youāre saying by this. Are you suggesting a happy medium of not voting too soon or too close to EOD? I feel like thatās a hard thing to filter as developments can happen in forums very easily.
This isnāt a point of suspicion against you. I just donāt know what youāre trying to say.
Can evils not convert if we vote the king (regardless of their alignment)? I feel like that changes a lot if so.
Man Iām seeing your messages and realizing I really shouldāve read over the conversion rules. Sorry for making you break things down. I figured it was like a vampire bite from TOS, so I didnāt look into it. If the king is evil, is it just a lost wolf that gets added to the scum chat after this EOD if they live? Thatās the impression Iām getting from what youāve said anyways.