Maybot's Combinatorics Mafia - GAME OVER, MAFIA WIN

How did you not notice I said the wrong dome haha

1 Like

Ok, I’m not sure about moon since their posts are light.

1 Like

Currently if I had to vote 3 mafia I would choose chomps, magnus, and maybe littlelee or prisma. If I believe chomps is mafia then based on their vote they would probably still shoot for a 1/3 again to make things difficult. That’s where I am currently.

2 Likes

What does that mean? I don’t know the lingo. Dome as in head/person?

Sorry - I said dome which referred to a “thunderdome” which is lingo for when there is a mechanically confirmed mafia in a group of players. E.g when a player claims to be a sheriff/cop and finds another player as mafia, as long as there is nothing else at play, those two players are considered to be in a “thunderdome” - either the sheriff is lying as mafia, or the sheriff has found a mafia.

In this instance when I say dome I mean the 1/3 we got when myself/fusion/chomps were checked.

1 Like

This is actually correct, I misinterpreted on my read based on this comment here. (#348)

Yes I have.

If you believe my proposed wagon is 0/3, this should be optimal for you.

1 Like

prisma is the least likely to be scum out of your proposed votes so if that ends up being true then lee/bad/prisma is also more than likely 1/3.

VOTE: Ash
VOTE: magnus
VOTE: Pandora

This is wrong, it only looks this way because others unvoted prior, I was fourth on two of them. This also isn’t relevant because Fusion / Badeline / Prisma was my original push, so anything other than that has to be from me acquiescing as a result. This push also sorta requires Fusion to be teamed with me, not Chomps.

Therefore, your voting context votes are inaccurate and depict me sheeping the sentiment shared by Fusion and Anonygoose.
It’s true I said not to vote Panda, but at worse that was me compelling Goose not to change their mind after it was already made, so “directing” is still a strong semantic.

Intentional omission, if I recall my thought process correctly. That’s not an interaction, that invites interaction which is what the former is.

You took one line out of my entire initial summary, this is a nitpick.

This is today, not yesterday, different scenario.

Anything I didn’t quote is either a retelling or vaguely correct, I’m sleep deprived so I don’t think it’s important to shout at everything.

I’m happy to be accused if my wagons flip 0/3, but I don’t think anyone could convincingly believe that I would lead that on purpose.

1 Like

I think this is true, I just don’t have a third if Badeline and Lee contains a villager so I cast a wider net.

1 Like

ok yeah we’re not doing that.
VOTE: Ash
VOTE: Magnus
VOTE: LittleLee

this is a shitshow lmao we all have totally different lists

Reminder that Ash was spewed town D1 and if I’m evil, I am also spewing Ash town today as we speak.

1 Like

I don’t think that’s how spew works mate

1 Like

It sorta is, if we can assume I would want to push a 1/3 flip in conjunction with the D1 jail.

1 Like

No you literally said you a 1/3 is better for town than a 0/3 earlier

Cool with Badeline/Prisma, but given that I townleen Lee, I still want to go after Quail over them.
VOTE: Badeline
VOTE: Prisma
VOTE: Quail

Consider the impact of clearing three slots from the POE I’ve heavily sided myself against in one swoop.

1 Like

was gonna let it go through as a semi-redcheck of magnus if it hit 1/3 but I don’t think that’s necessary anymore

I’m glad I’ve managed to change your mind onto chasing evil checks, at the very least.

1 Like