are we still doing 3 numbers
I did 3 numbers.
the results for the first three rounds are in:
Round 1:
- Marshal - full house [31]
- Ash - 3 of a kind [joker]
- Squirrel - 2 pair [164]
- Zone - DNS [198]
Round 2:
- Squirrel - 4 of a kind [59]
- Marshal - 3 of a kind [21]
- Ash - dns [223]
Third. Zone - dns [233]
Round 3:
- Zone - 4 of a kind [157]
- Squirrel - 4 of a kind [143]
- Ash - full house [209]
- Marshal - dns [214]
Marshal, Squirrel and Zone recieve 2 special guesses, Ash recieves 1 special guess.
Time to boot up the Enigma Machine in the morning (I am dead tired and only up for the HSR drip marketing).
Everone should have gained their results.
It is currently round 4.
luna approximately how “allowed to use python” are we
Very.
On that note, I have no clue what the Enigma Machine was or is doing.
its gonna be a long night. tho… definitely a lot less long than if the answer was no
If the others are fine with it, I’m fine with it.
I’m fine with it
I’ll probably use excel instead tho
excel cant quite brute force to my wishes… so python it is
PYTHON ENJOYER!!!
i am NOT enjoyering python
(just kidding… I actually was able to get the info I wanted. But it definitely took me longer than it should have)
aaaand just as I say that, I realize I forgot the constraint that all cards that start with a number have to, at the VERY least, be that number or higher. Maybe this reveals too much info, I dont think it really does. but back to the drawing board
man i doubly Fkd up… I just realized that I set ALL cards to be different, instead of just the ones on the same rank. That has approximately… 10x-d my number of worlds. I tried to copypaste all the data to googledocs and it crashed
aaaand i forgot to add the constraint that higher numbers in the same rank must be higher than lower numbers in the same rank. Roughly, erm, 0.15-xd my worlds.
I’m already envisioning the absolute fucking behemoth that I am going to have to build to mathematically get the best solve at the end.
This is… very worrisome.
4oaK - 59, 143, 157
Full House - 31, 209
3oaK - 21
Two Pair - 164
DNS - 198, 214, 223, 233
These numbers of DNS would have implied the lack of (many) high valued cards, but then there is [209] which was a Full House, indicating that there is at least one combination of high valued cards. (They’re just uncommon, it seems.)
I lied.
It was inspired from Usogoui’s number poker game.
(For my defense I made the forum version a few years ago, and slipped out of my mind, where the initial inspiration came from)