The “I dont think reads in general are bad early game.” mentality imo is bad since easily fakable by wolf
My main issue is how hard you were defending it (i.e. snap voting cape for calling it out) when it did so little
Cause I agree with Cape
I never gave thoughts on Leafeon because I was still sussing them out (I quoted the post and asked them about their read because I didn’t like it but wanted more of their thoughts to be more sure)
[quote=“Luka, post:318, topic:5853”]
I mean I’ve literally said I townread cape
But to elaborate I think vote was yikes because you think Cape’s behaviour is scummy because of your personal ideal (thinking that all serious read post in RVS is always a good thing (which I think is still a flawed mentality)) rather than actually finding his post as wolfy - you think that Leafeon is townie and Cape’s read on them was bad but never stated why you think Cape’s post came from wolf and thus justify your Cape vote
i.e. Your post doesn’t feel like you’re actually town scumhunting
Keyword: Later on
I read posts and quote/comment on them as I go
I don’t read every post then comment on them all in one go
“I already explained why its dumb.” then explain it again, here? I don’t remember you having explained it but maybe I forgot or missed it but if you’ve already explained it why not do it again here? Just saying “oh I dislike their reasoning” without stating why is BAD
They didn’t state it was gut until I pressured them on it
I see yikes post I point out yikes post simple as that
(This did backfire on me when I joined MU because I wasn’t used to Ara’s post style but I’m sure it’ll be fiiiine)
oh sick new potsu song dropped
Im gonna go have breakfast but afterwards I should be able to fully read up. My first instincts is icet scummy jarek and guava somewhat townie ill go into more detail soon
toodle doo