noting that this spews min v if squirrel is mafia
1 Like
Tinfoil: Is it possible that Squirrel and Ash are w/w and vote parked each other to distance from each other in vote count analysis.
I considered this but wouldnât they hop off each other now that theyâre both top wagons or are there actually no wolves in the thread? Lol
2 Likes
by the way, regarding squirrel
i have an interesting observation but youâll have to read it closely to understand what iâm saying
they had plenty of opportunities to move somewhere else tho but didnt
Thatâs true. I would have thought that their votes would move around more as the game progressed.
Yet thatâs not what weâre seeing.
Atlas too
Kinda think it means Atlas/Ash arenât w/w or Atlas wouldâve gone off by now
so, this is squirrelâs read progression on arctic
i find it interesting that squirrel first says arctic is looking for a villager to push, and mentions ash as one of these villagers
but later, when squirrel gives another read on arctic, he says arcticâs push on ash felt w/w, which directly contradicts the initial argument (that it was w/v)
interestingly, this matches his read change on ash, since he thinks ash is mafia now but he didnât think that beforehand
so, for some reason, when he recalls his initial reason for wolfreading arctic, he calls it w/w - which matches his current read on ash, but not his read on ash at the time
i think thatâs a wolf error made during an attempt to maintain progression
5 Likes
I donât think you randomly leave your rvs vote as if you forgot it was there when youâre voting your partner and your partner is at risk of going over
alright ill be honest
i think we should step back from wagonomics a bit here
big reason: we lack information on certain slots, that we will delve further into speculation hell, which can cloud some of our reads too much
i brought up wagonmics because there were some vote placements and movements that i found out of place and weird in regards to threadstate as it is currently right now (Marl and Atlas voting back to back, ash and squirrel crossvote, YBW Vote, Vulgard moving his vote off of ash)
3 Likes
This is like the contradiction he made in his readlist about loose
*moose
min was one of the villagers, the other was himself
Squirrel has min in his null reads though, not townreads
thatâs irrelevant
what squirrel was talking about was my vote on min, and then my vote back on him
i still think the post from vulgard was towny though
3 Likes
This part
squirrel says this: "he gave a thought on me-ash, then moved on to min, and then finally jumped back to me-ash after a while
kinda felt like heâs moving his vote around til he finds a v wagon that sticks"
he listed himself, min, and ash (twice)
this clearly implies heâs assuming ash is one of the villagers arctic is looking to push
but later, he says he thought arctic was doing a w/w push on ash, which is not what he originally implied
Yeah but if heâs implying youâre voting a villager he thinks min is a villager
Is that not what it implies?
Arc wasnât voting ash though iirc