Seems is just me missing context, so it becomes difficult to comprehend. Do you wish me to bother you with asking for more details to something that looks obvious to you or should I just nod and pass ahead?
“I’m going to solve this game from social”
“your cases point is actually just straight up useless because it is influenced by the player”
Please make your mind up
sure?
so if it’s against me, social reads are valid, but if it’s for me, it’s not
ok
Look good?
Sharing my thoughts and posting how I normally post (like a mother fucker) is looking good.
I wish people call me that in every game.
“Hey Seth you look good!”
Instead of
“He’s Seth, he’s normally wolfy!”
like I already committ, go right ahead.
what? they’re both done from a social standpoint wtf are you talking about?
wtf are you talking about would be a better thing to bring up
literally no one understands what you’re trying to say whatsoever
maybe you don’t.
Your counterargument is invalid because you’re relying on math to make your point when in reality it’s depend on what the player in those position does.
Rn, I don’t trust either of you to pass BRR when it happens and I find it likely you’re going to pass it off as RRR when that happens.
But
Wazza acknowledges that the player can influence it in the post?
he did, but hes passing it off as a 50/50 which isn’t right to begin because thats is a choice that people can socially interpret, not “Ima go flip a coin and do it this way”.
you literally quoted it
as in make decision and calculate risk
Very sorry if I’m being oblivious. Why did Amelia never get a choice in deciding Red or Blue? And I’m assuming Jane was vice president? And what did Wazza say that the last sentence is about whenever Amelia influenced Jane to discard the sith card or not?
I feel like I’ve missed so many things when I’m omnipresent in this thread.
No I’m not
I’m sorry if you’re looking at the amount of math and percentages that are there and interpret it as me thinking it’s simply just 50/50, I think you’re blind. If we wanted to expand it further and talk about every other nook and crevice then we’d be here all night, that’s why I constricted it to only the choice of me and Amelia with proof of the deck, reliability on what has been claimed and why you’re wrong
Yeah, let’s pretend that I’m just nodding and go futher
Jane received RBB
Jane dropped R
Amelia received BB
Amelia dropped B
B is enacted
Jane claimed BBR and discarded R which leaves Amelia with BB.
Ok, even if I end up misinterpreting, I end up going with a 0.6% by your math. Why shouldn’t I just skip, pass it to me and pick someone that I trust?
like 50% > 0.6% and if the vc attempt to create conflict, I will personally bury that guy.
And you 2 are having a math debate and from what I’m getting is:
No, you’re wrong because funny lady luck said so.
No, you’re wrong because math doesn’t lie