??? When did I say their vote was only omgus???
#1675 was me saying Arctic posted a cop cover PSA, which Cait claimed was LAMIST, after which Arctic voted her.
My point there is that even after that whole interaction happened, you were “surprised” we needed to do cop covers — meaning you somehow missed it.
Even if Arctic had other reasons for voting Cait, you can’t deny that her calling him LAMIST was the trigger.
I can, in fact deny this, given that he is me, and I remember exactly what I was thinking at the time
I thought caitlin’s read on me was bad, but not worth a vote, and I voted them 2 minutes later after seeing their later posts, which I quoted just after the post where I voted
So garfooled is right
But this whole thing feels pointless anyway
Ok fair enough
I remembered lamist part once you mentioned it
But I didn’t think it was the primary trigger
And you didn’t include the parts I remembered the most
Which felt a bit like you were rewriting what actually happened
Mmm you’re not the first one to claim my reads are TMI-ish. Jane said that during Mountainous Arson in MU too.
Tbh it’s because I like psychology and I read behaviour + tone.
I’m not saying particularly that lamist was the trigger
But I cannot in fact say for certain it wasn’t
And I still think the way you framed that feels a bit like a “rewriting history” sort of thing
And selective
But that could just be lazy quoting
Or quoting parts that fit what you’re trying to convey
I wonder if it’s purposeful
The way you ignored their other reasons
What do you consider
“Towny”?
Like should I barf Skittles for you?
I think I’ve been fairly town
I don’t want to barf Skittles
I like Skittles
(why am I still here, oh yes… I’m procrastinating making something)
Puke rainbows or the votes staying
anyways townie things are town
Do you want me to leave a carrot trail for you to get town read sob
If i say its townie its no longer townie
The “reasons you listed after voting her” included the LAMIST part (#94).
May I direct you to Mountainous Arson (Completed: Mountainous Arson 17p), then? That was my first MU game and pretty recent (sandwiched between my last full wolfgame and most recent towngame).
The other reasons was not included because it was not the point of the post. The point of the post was about cop covers.
Ok I understand the point now
I’m not really reading into things closely
I wasn’t surprised about the cop covers
Where did you get that from?
(I was too focused on honing in on what you might be doing from scum pov and not really reading what you were trying to get from me. I am too focused on questioning you when you are trying to get answers from me lol)
im not even trying to get specifically a TR from you
i dont understand where your read on me is coming from
its strange
maybe im missing posts
(ok im defnitely missing posts)
but your reasoning feels stale
the summarization of it at least
i wonder if you really believe in it
also i thought i already said
i am not barfing skittles for you
i like skittles
My reasoning is that your entire ISO is weird. The only thing that is townie is general attitude and thats easily faked by an experienced player. I disagree with your reads, they feel as though you’re trying to contribute without contributing. The reads given in genreal were very weird too. I can give you a post that explains my thoughts on your slot
You do have townie posts, undoubtably. But so does everybody else in this game; its kind of me settling for LHF in a sense which is wolfie but your slot, regardless of how low hanging it is, is towns best bet atp imo
Changed my pfp early since noivern