Why does Phraze claim N3 Vigilante, why did Phraze’s action failed?
We know Bystander claimed about no visitors on me with her Voyeur action as JOAT.
Does that mean there is another JOAT alive and lied about their claim? This also means whoever is N2 Vigilante also fakeclaimed, meaning Hippo is exactly Rolecop?
But I think Phraze is a liar for claiming N3 Vigilante and is instead N2 Vigilante.
for the record I dont really find mechanical arguments against phraze convincing. first of all I think we know zug was an odd role, so there’s literally like a 50% chance or something that he was a roleblocker? assuming Apo is indeed n1/n3 doctor
but also luxy said something that made me remember scum could have fake claimed along the way, probably fairly easily, and then we could just have the wrong idea of which scum roles are in play
like there is too much plausible deniability to pretend phraze’s claim alone indicates scum