anyone but the yurkin voters probably highest chance of an evil team being active on the counterwagon that was chomps but if you want to believe the entire evil team outside of yurkin was idling then non-voters I guess
Jarek is leaning towards pure wagon, but he has doubts.
In that case he should expand that perspective as in why thatâs the case. He initially brought up, that either me or Leafia would be wolf in this scenario, but I think he should explain how Magnus, lol and Derps fit in the picture somehow.
Which thereâs is time for such theories in the meantime
Because IIRC those three actively voted and I have a hard time believing evils just decide to bus their own teammate over just putting +1 vote on chomps
bear in mind, chomps is voting themselves so theyâre kinda whack
what does THAT MEAN
WAHHH
lol also voted Chomps before joining the wagon on Yurkin, Magnus have expressed an opinion about the self vote. I have reason to believe that Chomps wagon doesnt bode well with me, so I voted Yurkin. Leafiaâs dead. Derps only voted Yurkin for the same reason as I have.
Thatâs the nutshell of Yurkin voters.
people who voted on EOD are the only ones with any weight to theri vote
There is simply no ulterior motive for this.
@Magnus, I made an error while typing the post you just liked. I meant to say that Kiiruma argued that yurkin should not be âunderestimatedâ, not âexecutedâ.
So we did not understimated Yurkin, got it
Overall, I imagine a fully competent Kiiruma would never treat a wolf partner like this while a villager Chomps wagon was looking possible or even likely. He received no credibility for pushing yurkin over while also failing to meaningfully defend them or push alternative executions.
Of course, this breaks down if Chomps is a wolf. I can see Kiiruma as paired with yurkin and Chomps quite easily.
This behavior would make much more sense from a wolf Kiiruma if both wagons were wolves and he did not have a particularly strong preference as to which went over (but still preferred a Chomps execution over yurkin, as a more active partner staying alive would be preferable to Chomps being the one to survive).
That being said, I can also see Kiiruma simply being a villager here.
Leafia voted Yurkin at a time when Chomps was heavily on the block, and thus swayed the wagons mostly on her own merit. Leafia was confirmed town over this and evils made the best option in killing her.
You joined Leafia on the wagon with limited preamble â this is less clearing because joining a wagon takes less effort than starting it, and you didnât justify your reasons to distrust Chomps as an execution, so townreading you entirely focuses on your inquisitive spirit prior to earlier on.
SDA voted Yurkin upon being prompted to do so, entirely seeming to lack an opinion; but Lol moved from Chomps to Yurkin with him. This can feasibly be a partner deciding to jump ship so as to look good either way, but Yurkinâs own approach earlier in the game more so resembles an attempt to pocket Lol more than anything else, which the mark called out.
I voted Yurkin because my teammates were Chomps and Yurkin so I felt like playing dangerously. Nobody so much as spoke a word against me yesterday so I can claim evil here and now and nobody will blink.
Your conclusion is fundamentally that Kiiruma acted far too performative without pushing enough agenda to express behaviour which comprehensibly arrives from an evilâs mindset, presuming their goals and motivations are actually being met. I can recognise this position and support it.
My choice of response here would be to wordlessly peck your visor and stepped away without any explanation, if you pressed for an explanation.
I am an innocent angel
I came into today with a similar thought
Magnus how dare you