https://www.fortressoflies.com/t/popcorn3-town-victory/6952/783
Wolf bionic game
1 Like
2 Nulls 1 TR vs
2 TRs
1 Like
Zug mentioned also plenty of town popcorn games too,
I get townreading Leafia, but why Otter?
Are there more than just this popcorn game that was discussed? If so I didnāt realize we were talking about a group of popcorn games lol
Positive interaction with them explaining their reasoning to TR Hazard off interaction + I agree with their logic behind Acro
Here
Well, āgamesā I thought it was three and not two
Hmm, I havent read the town one (obviously) but just based off that wouldnt that make Bionic more rand town here? regardless of discussion on quality of solving, they do have actual reads that make sense from a logic perspective
Follow Zugās progression on Bionic here and you can see why is actually not seeing him as town and seems to think independently up until Crescent brought it up.
Which is why I intend to pursue Zug tomorrow.
Are you able to try rewording this not 100% sure what exactly this means
Otter hasnāt been on my radar much as a low poster, but re-reading their ISO there is one thing that bugs me. Nothing seems to have significantly changed between her having Bionic as town for ābeing in his town metaā and voting Bionic later.
I donāt know if they actually changed their read on Bionic though?
They reason they said they voted Bionic is āI guess Iāll sheepā
@otterpopd explain why you are hedging on Bionic
His vote does gets my attention to his role in the current thread state.
What specifically is strange about Bionic?
Iām now going through the playerlist and attempting to get reads on my nulls. Currently, I have
Hazard - medium town
Millium - lean town
Brakuren - light town
Marluna - nulltown
Iāve been going back and forth on Derps, and to some degree Bionic. Iād rather go through everyone else first though.
1 Like
Thatās the point. It feels like an obvious disconnect between stance and vote, with nothing in the middle to explain why.
Yeah you did from your ISO.
Yeah itās weird but I wouldnāt say itās enough for me to change my read on them.
I would rather just ask them why they changed their and examine their logic, because I did this before with them and they had a good explanation
Itās the one thing in the ISO that sticks out to me and an explanation is warranted, yes. I donāt really have any problems with them from anything else I read.