I had this message predrafted, which I didn’t want to send until after the first votecount because I thought I’d be accused of TMI’ing that the game was continuing or something silly like that. It’s strange how oftentimes villagers can feel just as hampered as evils in what they’re allowed to say, sometimes.
Summary
There is no moral accomplishment in the deed of correcting a false read on the final day, it shouldn’t have reached this point at all. I thought you would be super easy to read so I just never bothered to reassess it when a second threat didn’t manifest itself, and I crammed Zug into a box even though my verbiage acknowledged issues with that assumption. Why pretend that it isn’t so?
You successfully remained under cover for a week without the slightest bounds of town-led suspicion, and considering your streak of evil rands and losses, this game must have been some relief. You played better than I did, and I take no pleasure in detecting the crime only after the riches were robbed. Of course this could be seen as insincere if I was evil, trying to applaud a villager for being super devious and that’s how you might feel forced to acknowledge it publicly, but either way you’d know the truth.
At the very least I’d hope being in control would be of some relief to Rhea, given their talk about never winning in this position, but given their broken device there’s no guarantee they’ll even be back to cast a vote either way. So let’s just mess around or whatever.
